Category talk:Adventurer races

A few opinions I have about things:

• 1) The race pages are all triple-linked. Ew. Basically, I think all race links can be removed because the articles are categorised here already and forcibly linked as a result. (That means the whole "The adventurer races are: Dwarf, Human..." first sentence can be deleted.)
• 2) The "racial (dis)advantages" column on the chart is meaningless. Humans have racial advantages, so essentially every race should end up getting marked with a "Y".
• 3) Satyrs and Atavians should be moved to singular (Satyr and Atavian) like the other race pages. (I'm kind of ambivalent about whether Greater Dragons needs to be moved, though..)

--Krypton 05:41, 19 January 2008 (GMT)

I just transferred this from somewhere else when it was shifted to a category, do as you want with it in regards to it. Corvax

maggots and toads

if I create a separate article for maggots and toads, should they get added here? Paine 18:50, 14 February 2008 (GMT)

Should there be one for Shrubs too? Corvax 19:45, 14 February 2008 (GMT)

Heh. I think Divine punishment makes enough mention of all three. If you were to add specifics, though, I would do it to that page rather than in new articles. Then maybe make toad, maggot, and shrub redirects? --Krypton 20:16, 14 February 2008 (GMT)

Hm. I guess the question is whether or not "maggot" and "toad" are "races". Asara 00:32, 15 February 2008 (GMT)

I wouldn't say so. I would say instead that, through Divine ministration, you are simply being punished by having your sentient mind placed within the bodies of some of the lowliest non-sentient creatures. --Krypton 06:03, 15 February 2008 (GMT)