Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zsarachnor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
PUBLIC NEWS #1671, 1699, 1703 - The church has brought the wrath of Zsarachnor to the realm. [[User:Madelyne|Madelyne]] 16:55, 3 April 2007 (GMT) | PUBLIC NEWS #1671, 1699, 1703 - The church has brought the wrath of Zsarachnor to the realm. [[User:Madelyne|Madelyne]] 16:55, 3 April 2007 (GMT) | ||
Would be nice for someone to write a bit in here about Zsarachnor's history, service during the War of the Gods, why he is now banned to the prime material plane, et cetera. [[User:Trusler|Trusler]] 03:46, 21 June 2007 (GMT) | |||
Since [[:Category:Vampires]] is now a subcategory of [[:Category:Azdun Denizens]], would removing Z from the latter be an advisable use of LCD policies? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:35, 3 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
:Never mind, I'd say no because not all vampires are in Azdun, i.e. it's not a given that because Z is categorised in Vampires, he is in Azdun. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:44, 3 January 2008 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 14:44, 3 January 2008
PUBLIC NEWS #1671, 1699, 1703 - The church has brought the wrath of Zsarachnor to the realm. Madelyne 16:55, 3 April 2007 (GMT)
Would be nice for someone to write a bit in here about Zsarachnor's history, service during the War of the Gods, why he is now banned to the prime material plane, et cetera. Trusler 03:46, 21 June 2007 (GMT)
Since Category:Vampires is now a subcategory of Category:Azdun Denizens, would removing Z from the latter be an advisable use of LCD policies? --Krypton 14:35, 3 January 2008 (GMT)
- Never mind, I'd say no because not all vampires are in Azdun, i.e. it's not a given that because Z is categorised in Vampires, he is in Azdun. --Krypton 14:44, 3 January 2008 (GMT)