Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hashan"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
117 bytes added ,  02:21, 22 July 2007
no edit summary
m
Line 15: Line 15:


:If the being was destroyed and no longer exists, it would belong in the historical figures category. Any "<area> Denizen" category should only include current denizens (unless specified otherwise). A Sentontot is more of a creature than a denizen (it is not sentient), so it would belong in the creatures category and not the denizen category (or the inhabitants list). The prostitutes question is a bit tougher - I would probably leave it in the denizen list as the category is appropriate for the prostitutes article itself (Kaethryn being a prostitute). [[User:Asara|Asara]] 03:52, 13 July 2007 (GMT)
:If the being was destroyed and no longer exists, it would belong in the historical figures category. Any "<area> Denizen" category should only include current denizens (unless specified otherwise). A Sentontot is more of a creature than a denizen (it is not sentient), so it would belong in the creatures category and not the denizen category (or the inhabitants list). The prostitutes question is a bit tougher - I would probably leave it in the denizen list as the category is appropriate for the prostitutes article itself (Kaethryn being a prostitute). [[User:Asara|Asara]] 03:52, 13 July 2007 (GMT)
The laws of Hashan are searchable...should the Great Canon of Hashan in the infobox be internally linked? -- Bluef
5

edits

Navigation menu