Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Survival"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:No, don't categorize Survival under the Abilities category since Survival is not an ability. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 04:47, 24 January 2008 (GMT) | :No, don't categorize Survival under the Abilities category since Survival is not an ability. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 04:47, 24 January 2008 (GMT) | ||
::Right, but is it worthwhile to categorise everything in [[:Category:Survival]] in [[:Category:Abilities]], too? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 06:09, 24 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 06:09, 24 January 2008
I'm leaving this out of "pending deletion" for now. We can always stick it back in, later. This and Vision are not class-related but are globally used (at least up to selfishness and farsight, respectively), unlike Riding which depends on the adventurer having a mountable loyal. Madelyne 20:31, 8 August 2007 (GMT)
Does anyone else think the articles categorised here should also be categorised in Category:Abilities? That would be consistent with the way superscribe in Category:Tattoos and icewall, firelash, and waterwalking (among others) in Category:Enchantment are all also categorised in Category:Abilities. Since every article under this category could fittingly be categorised under Category:Abilities, we -could- just categorise Category:Survival in Category:Abilities so that none of the articles categorised here would have to be, but it would be awfully confusing to have this category be in both Category:Skills and Category:Abilities. --Krypton 03:15, 24 January 2008 (GMT)
- No, don't categorize Survival under the Abilities category since Survival is not an ability. Asara 04:47, 24 January 2008 (GMT)
- Right, but is it worthwhile to categorise everything in Category:Survival in Category:Abilities, too? --Krypton 06:09, 24 January 2008 (GMT)