Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assassins"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Agreed. Other thoughts? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 13:33, 31 March 2008 (GMT) | :Agreed. Other thoughts? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 13:33, 31 March 2008 (GMT) | ||
::Just that, if this is done, the same should be followed up with [[Champions]] and [[Ivory Mark]]. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 15:20, 31 March 2008 (GMT) | ::Just that, if this is done, the same should be followed up with [[Champions]] and [[Ivory Mark]]. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 15:20, 31 March 2008 (GMT) | ||
:::Also, something to watch out for is that, once Assassins redirects to Quisalis (and Champions to Ivory), there will be pages that redundantly link to Quisalis/Ivory. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 20:22, 31 March 2008 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 20:22, 31 March 2008
I'm not so sure about the Death category here. I'm also thinking maybe this would be better off as a redirect to the Quisalis as it is, although if there are other kinds of assassins it could usea little more filling in. Soludra 02:32, 31 March 2008 (GMT)
- Agreed. Other thoughts? Asara 13:33, 31 March 2008 (GMT)
- Just that, if this is done, the same should be followed up with Champions and Ivory Mark. --Krypton 15:20, 31 March 2008 (GMT)
- Also, something to watch out for is that, once Assassins redirects to Quisalis (and Champions to Ivory), there will be pages that redundantly link to Quisalis/Ivory. --Krypton 20:22, 31 March 2008 (GMT)
- Just that, if this is done, the same should be followed up with Champions and Ivory Mark. --Krypton 15:20, 31 March 2008 (GMT)