Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anointed"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'd like to see this article talk about the historical aspects of the anointed and their accomplishments or failures, not necessarily constant updates about their leadership structure. anyone can look at CLANHELP ANOINTED in game, and it's constantly changing. they're also not nearly as influential as they once were. [[User:Paine|Paine]] 15:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC) | I'd like to see this article talk about the historical aspects of the anointed and their accomplishments or failures, not necessarily constant updates about their leadership structure. anyone can look at CLANHELP ANOINTED in game, and it's constantly changing. they're also not nearly as influential as they once were. [[User:Paine|Paine]] 15:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. I was just going to ask why we really needed include the positions at all. The historical and storyline aspects, like the year formed, disturbances, etc., would be far more pertinent. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:36, 17 February 2009
Still in Edit needed because its positions need to be watched (being a clan, they tend to change). Could also do with year formed, and details about the disturbance they were causing (eg. when, what exactly they were doing). --Kunama 16:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
I'd like to see this article talk about the historical aspects of the anointed and their accomplishments or failures, not necessarily constant updates about their leadership structure. anyone can look at CLANHELP ANOINTED in game, and it's constantly changing. they're also not nearly as influential as they once were. Paine 15:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I was just going to ask why we really needed include the positions at all. The historical and storyline aspects, like the year formed, disturbances, etc., would be far more pertinent. Asara 17:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)