17
edits
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Documents"
no edit summary
m (answer) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
That was prompt! Thoughts? I'll be doing my giant typo report later today, per the first line of Support's response. I know it's rather an inconclusive response from them, though ... "In some cases"? — [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 16:35, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | That was prompt! Thoughts? I'll be doing my giant typo report later today, per the first line of Support's response. I know it's rather an inconclusive response from them, though ... "In some cases"? — [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 16:35, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:Go ahead and follow through with the TYPOs. Unfortunately, some of the TYPOs we've experienced in the past have not passed despite the corrections being grammatically sound. For now, do not correct article document typos unless they are addressed via TYPO too - these IC texts should be a direct reflection of the actual IC material. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 19:50, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | :Go ahead and follow through with the TYPOs. Unfortunately, some of the TYPOs we've experienced in the past have not passed despite the corrections being grammatically sound. For now, do not correct article document typos unless they are addressed via TYPO too - these IC texts should be a direct reflection of the actual IC material. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 19:50, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
::They have been followed through, and I will certainly heed your advice next time. All the typo reports I've done have passed, though ... your mileage may vary, I guess! — [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 20:47, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
:::Excellent! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:08, 12 April 2008 (GMT) | |||