17
edits
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Adventurers"
Category talk:Adventurers (view source)
Revision as of 22:42, 24 January 2008
, 22:42, 24 January 2008no edit summary
m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*Example 2 - [[New Hope]]: The discoverer (Riashain) has his name in the infobox, but it is currently not bolded in the context of the article. This example is also applies to my question, in which I wonder if we ought to bold the names of all adventurers who play a major role in any event, i.e. in addition to bolding Riashain's name, we should also for Trevalyan and Goryllin. | *Example 2 - [[New Hope]]: The discoverer (Riashain) has his name in the infobox, but it is currently not bolded in the context of the article. This example is also applies to my question, in which I wonder if we ought to bold the names of all adventurers who play a major role in any event, i.e. in addition to bolding Riashain's name, we should also for Trevalyan and Goryllin. | ||
:--[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:28, 24 January 2008 (GMT) | :--[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:28, 24 January 2008 (GMT) | ||
Ah I see, okay. I wouldn't mind it and it doesn't look too bad, but it would probably cause less headache just to leave out the bolding entirely. Otherwise we'd get into complications regarding discoverer technicalities, like the one Krypton has suggested. ("Major role" + discover? Event post name references only? Subjectivity etc.?) If you're willing to hash all this out though, doesn't matter to me. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 22:42, 24 January 2008 (GMT) | |||