Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Adventurers"

Category talk:Adventurers (view source)

769 bytes added , 21:28, 24 January 2008

no edit summary

1,131

edits

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :I think that's a good thing to do. It would be equivalent to, in a House article, simply mentioning the tutor's name in the infobox, but linking it when the name is brought up in the context of the article. As for generic bolding of adventurers' names, do most people think it would be a good idea to do that for adventurers who play a major role in the development of events? --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 18:41, 24 January 2008 (GMT)
 ::Can you link me to an example of this? I don't quite follow. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 20:38, 24 January 2008 (GMT)
+----
+*Example 1 - [[Aran'riod]]: The discoverer (Senans) has his name both in the infobox and bolded on its first mention in the actual context of the article.
+*Example 1.5 - [[Adryn's Keep]]: The discoverer (Iocun) has his name in the infobox, but it was not bolded in the context of the article until Gnaash just made the change.
+*Example 2 - [[New Hope]]: The discoverer (Riashain) has his name in the infobox, but it is currently not bolded in the context of the article. This example is also applies to my question, in which I wonder if we ought to bold the names of all adventurers who play a major role in any event, i.e. in addition to bolding Riashain's name, we should also for Trevalyan and Goryllin.
+:--[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:28, 24 January 2008 (GMT)