78
edits
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Humgii"
Category talk:Humgii (view source)
Revision as of 00:33, 12 September 2008
, 00:33, 12 September 2008Small fix
(Comment) |
m (Small fix) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:For Delphinus: What of Maya's acknowledgment of humgii sentience? Also, if some unicorns are flagged as sentient, then that should be reflected by categorizing the unicorns article under denizens as well as creatures with our current policy. Unfortunately you'll also note that the working definition for the Denizen races category is differentiated from others via being "humanoid", so dolphins and unicorns would not be (and are not) classified under such already. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | :For Delphinus: What of Maya's acknowledgment of humgii sentience? Also, if some unicorns are flagged as sentient, then that should be reflected by categorizing the unicorns article under denizens as well as creatures with our current policy. Unfortunately you'll also note that the working definition for the Denizen races category is differentiated from others via being "humanoid", so dolphins and unicorns would not be (and are not) classified under such already. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
::I had hoped to squeeze this in before a reply. If humgiis are sentient, the implication here is that nearly every player-run organisation (including Shallam) engages in slavery. And that's... really just silly, and a bad outcome overall in a lot of ways. Again - "Sentient creatures," which would fit the definition presented in HELP DENIZENS a whole lot better as well and would thus be fitting for the groups to which they belong. -{{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 00:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | ::I had hoped to squeeze this in before a reply. If humgiis are sentient, the implication here is that nearly every player-run organisation (including Shallam) engages in slavery. And that's... really just silly, and a bad outcome overall in a lot of ways. Again - "Sentient creatures," which would fit the definition presented in HELP DENIZENS a whole lot better as well and would thus be fitting for the groups to which they belong. -{{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 00:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Bah, edit conflict. To the section for me, that's why I think changing the definition of Denizens to be less exclusive, so it encompasses both sentient and non-sentient beings. We would have | :::Bah, edit conflict. To the section for me, that's why I think changing the definition of Denizens to be less exclusive, so it encompasses both sentient and non-sentient beings. We would have '''Creatures''' and '''Sentient creatures''' (like Delphinus suggested) as subcategories, along with the current subcategories in Category:Denizens. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 00:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | ||