17
edits
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::::I don't really see a need to differentiate. As far as is known, Shallam as a city and Shallam as an empire were the same political entity. Seleucar and the Seleucarian Empire, however, were distinct creatures in entirely different leagues. -- {{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 23:06, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | ::::I don't really see a need to differentiate. As far as is known, Shallam as a city and Shallam as an empire were the same political entity. Seleucar and the Seleucarian Empire, however, were distinct creatures in entirely different leagues. -- {{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 23:06, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | ||
:::::Hmm, they may still technically be the same tangible entity today, but Shallam as a city and Shallam as an empire have distinct territories in entirely different ages. Shallam (city) is today's Shallam. Shallam (empire) is Shallam pre-Selecular. *shrug*. Up to you all though, of course. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:29, 27 April 2007 (GMT) | :::::Hmm, they may still technically be the same tangible entity today, but Shallam as a city and Shallam as an empire have distinct territories in entirely different ages. Shallam (city) is today's Shallam. Shallam (empire) is Shallam pre-Selecular. *shrug*. Up to you all though, of course. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:29, 27 April 2007 (GMT) | ||
:::::Or, even better, let's put some sort of mention of the Shallamese Empire in the actual Shallam article? Perhaps under history? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:29, 27 April 2007 (GMT) |