Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Documents"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(verbatim vs. spelling/grammar mistakes) |
(answer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regarding the recent changes to various documents, content in those articles should be verbatim, grammar/spelling mistakes and all, no? If typo reports result in getting them corrected in realms, then it's obviously okay to go ahead with changes in the lore article. But otherwise, it is only natural to keep the original text. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 02:34, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | Regarding the recent changes to various documents, content in those articles should be verbatim, grammar/spelling mistakes and all, no? If typo reports result in getting them corrected in realms, then it's obviously okay to go ahead with changes in the lore article. But otherwise, it is only natural to keep the original text. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 02:34, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:I am planning to embark on a MASSIVE typo report in-realms, which will cause the original and the Chronicles text to line up. It may take some time, but eventually everything should be fixed. — [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 02:36, 11 April 2008 (GMT) |
Revision as of 02:36, 11 April 2008
Regarding the recent changes to various documents, content in those articles should be verbatim, grammar/spelling mistakes and all, no? If typo reports result in getting them corrected in realms, then it's obviously okay to go ahead with changes in the lore article. But otherwise, it is only natural to keep the original text. --Krypton 02:34, 11 April 2008 (GMT)
- I am planning to embark on a MASSIVE typo report in-realms, which will cause the original and the Chronicles text to line up. It may take some time, but eventually everything should be fixed. — Kenner 02:36, 11 April 2008 (GMT)