Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ram's Horn (disambiguation)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Commenting) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Maybe '''Ram's horn (public)''' or '''Ram's horn (object)'''? I do think '''Ram's horns''' (and singular) should be redirect to the disambig *nod*. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 17:25, 3 April 2008 (GMT) | Maybe '''Ram's horn (public)''' or '''Ram's horn (object)'''? I do think '''Ram's horns''' (and singular) should be redirect to the disambig *nod*. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 17:25, 3 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:If we choose to, yes Ram's horn should redirect to the disambig and "Ram's horn (public)" is fine, but I'm not completely sold on it. Personally, I don't mind leaving [[Ram's horn]] the way it is and having people use the disambig note at the top of the article to get to the artefact. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 23:06, 3 April 2008 (GMT) |
Revision as of 23:06, 3 April 2008
Possible non-disambiguation pages + comments:
- ram's horn (artefact) - this one should be straightforward
- ram's horns - possibly for the giant, public kind, but what if we should want this to be a page that redirects to the disambigation?
- ram's horn (insert your idea for the giant, public kind here) - *rally*
--Krypton 14:48, 3 April 2008 (GMT)
Maybe Ram's horn (public) or Ram's horn (object)? I do think Ram's horns (and singular) should be redirect to the disambig *nod*. ~Soludra 17:25, 3 April 2008 (GMT)
- If we choose to, yes Ram's horn should redirect to the disambig and "Ram's horn (public)" is fine, but I'm not completely sold on it. Personally, I don't mind leaving Ram's horn the way it is and having people use the disambig note at the top of the article to get to the artefact. Asara 23:06, 3 April 2008 (GMT)