Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pills"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(on signed posts, specific cures, and lost elixirs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Are the cures specific (i.e. cures stupidity only?) Otherwise, I agree. And don't forget to sign your posts! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:25, 16 September 2007 (GMT) | :Are the cures specific (i.e. cures stupidity only?) Otherwise, I agree. And don't forget to sign your posts! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:25, 16 September 2007 (GMT) | ||
::The first and only time I will make that mistake! Here, let me sign twice for good measure. :) --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:32, 16 September 2007 (GMT) --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:32, 16 September 2007 (GMT) | |||
:::On a more on-topic note, if the cures are indeed specific, then I would suggest mentioning them on the Lost Elixirs entry. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:32, 16 September 2007 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 14:32, 16 September 2007
Are the strange-looking half-lines on the table able to be gotten rid of? And since each pill links to its herbal equivalent, the Other label seems redundant (unless we were to include more information like the scholastic pill's "brown in colour?).
- Are the cures specific (i.e. cures stupidity only?) Otherwise, I agree. And don't forget to sign your posts! Asara 14:25, 16 September 2007 (GMT)
- On a more on-topic note, if the cures are indeed specific, then I would suggest mentioning them on the Lost Elixirs entry. --Krypton 14:32, 16 September 2007 (GMT)