Difference between revisions of "Talk:Temple of Scarlatti"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Commenting) |
m (minor indentatio) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I like the detail, but it seems -too- detailed compared to other Temple pages I've seen... it's more of a "walk-through" style here than anything else. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 23:50, 13 April 2008 (GMT) | I like the detail, but it seems -too- detailed compared to other Temple pages I've seen... it's more of a "walk-through" style here than anything else. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 23:50, 13 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:Maybe so! Feel free to take out bits if you like. I thought the bizarre architecture was rather notable, though. [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 20:02, 14 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
::Why not just make the other temple pages more detailed to compensate? I mean, nothing compares to the "walk-through-ness" of [[Erisian Pyramid|this page]], after all. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:46, 14 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
:::This is true! I think the Erisian Pyramid rather lends itself well to the "walk-through" style anyways, although I certainly wouldn't mind having more detail in the Temple pages, rather than removing it here. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 03:45, 15 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:45, 15 April 2008
I like the detail, but it seems -too- detailed compared to other Temple pages I've seen... it's more of a "walk-through" style here than anything else. ~Soludra 23:50, 13 April 2008 (GMT)
- Maybe so! Feel free to take out bits if you like. I thought the bizarre architecture was rather notable, though. Kenner 20:02, 14 April 2008 (GMT)
- Why not just make the other temple pages more detailed to compensate? I mean, nothing compares to the "walk-through-ness" of this page, after all. --Krypton 21:46, 14 April 2008 (GMT)
- This is true! I think the Erisian Pyramid rather lends itself well to the "walk-through" style anyways, although I certainly wouldn't mind having more detail in the Temple pages, rather than removing it here. ~Soludra 03:45, 15 April 2008 (GMT)
- Why not just make the other temple pages more detailed to compensate? I mean, nothing compares to the "walk-through-ness" of this page, after all. --Krypton 21:46, 14 April 2008 (GMT)