Difference between revisions of "Talk:Entropy"
(not historical figures?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Probably as 'Terms' again! --[[User:Tasshya|Tasshya]] 19:37, 29 October 2006 (GMT) | Probably as 'Terms' again! --[[User:Tasshya|Tasshya]] 19:37, 29 October 2006 (GMT) | ||
Delphinus suggested Historical Figures, since they are actually beings, not just the terms 'entropy' and 'discord'. I'll place them both under that category for now, and if there's an objection it can easily be changed. [[User:Lynna|Lynna]] 21:33, 29 October 2006 (GMT) | |||
Since it seems Entropy and Discord are still around to this day (due to the manner Babel was able to call them to Him), they should be taken out of the historical figures category, right? And these pages should perhaps mention to Whom Entropy and Discord are bound. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 17:03, 19 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:03, 19 April 2008
This is a Chaotic subject, so I tried to approach it and Discord as objectively as I could. Please do correct me if I made a mistake. Also, how should this be categorized? Lynna 15:30, 29 October 2006 (GMT)
Probably as 'Terms' again! --Tasshya 19:37, 29 October 2006 (GMT)
Delphinus suggested Historical Figures, since they are actually beings, not just the terms 'entropy' and 'discord'. I'll place them both under that category for now, and if there's an objection it can easily be changed. Lynna 21:33, 29 October 2006 (GMT)
Since it seems Entropy and Discord are still around to this day (due to the manner Babel was able to call them to Him), they should be taken out of the historical figures category, right? And these pages should perhaps mention to Whom Entropy and Discord are bound. --Krypton 17:03, 19 April 2008 (GMT)