Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bay of Dardanos"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(gates) |
m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Concerning the removal of the "Cnidian Gates" link, would you be averse to keeping the article around in a bare-bones form? "It is called this and it is located here," or something thereabouts. -{{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 15:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC) | Concerning the removal of the "Cnidian Gates" link, would you be averse to keeping the article around in a bare-bones form? "It is called this and it is located here," or something thereabouts. -{{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 15:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I suppose it depends what's in the article. What did you have in mind? I'll ask Big N. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Thinking about it a bit more, I guess it would be a disservice -not- not include it from the Chronicler standpoint. Geographical information would certainly be OK, I just don't know how blurby it would be. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
I missed the last paragraph the first time around - I'm confused about the mention of Lemnian sea fauna. Was that supposed to be there? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 20:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I've fixed the above and put Cnidian Gates back in now that it's semi-public (my comment from 1/23/09 should have said "disservice -not- to include"). We'd like to leave it unlinked, though, for now. Thanks! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:42, 26 May 2009
Concerning the removal of the "Cnidian Gates" link, would you be averse to keeping the article around in a bare-bones form? "It is called this and it is located here," or something thereabouts. -Delphinus @ 15:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I suppose it depends what's in the article. What did you have in mind? I'll ask Big N. Asara 17:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thinking about it a bit more, I guess it would be a disservice -not- not include it from the Chronicler standpoint. Geographical information would certainly be OK, I just don't know how blurby it would be. Asara 14:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I missed the last paragraph the first time around - I'm confused about the mention of Lemnian sea fauna. Was that supposed to be there? Asara 20:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I've fixed the above and put Cnidian Gates back in now that it's semi-public (my comment from 1/23/09 should have said "disservice -not- to include"). We'd like to leave it unlinked, though, for now. Thanks! Asara 14:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)