Difference between revisions of "Talk:Temple of Destruction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regarding the edit comment, if you wanted to include that the Temple's denizens are now loyal to Maya, you could always mention it in regards to Makali's merge with Maya, as that is a valid IC rationale. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:31, 19 April 2008 (GMT) | Regarding the edit comment, if you wanted to include that the Temple's denizens are now loyal to Maya, you could always mention it in regards to Makali's merge with Maya, as that is a valid IC rationale. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:31, 19 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:The only denizens in the Temple of Destruction (at least in the public portion, if there is a private one) are the small, black moths, which, as unnamed denizens, will never require their own page in which we would have to state their loyalties. They may simply be mentioned in passing in this article. As for who the totems are tuned to, that doesn't warrant a mention in the least bit. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 15:24, 19 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:24, 19 April 2008
Regarding the edit comment, if you wanted to include that the Temple's denizens are now loyal to Maya, you could always mention it in regards to Makali's merge with Maya, as that is a valid IC rationale. Asara 14:31, 19 April 2008 (GMT)
- The only denizens in the Temple of Destruction (at least in the public portion, if there is a private one) are the small, black moths, which, as unnamed denizens, will never require their own page in which we would have to state their loyalties. They may simply be mentioned in passing in this article. As for who the totems are tuned to, that doesn't warrant a mention in the least bit. --Krypton 15:24, 19 April 2008 (GMT)