Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zanzibaar"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(feedback needed) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Any of the above can be discussed for consistency for future articles. Thanks! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 16:52, 17 April 2008 (GMT) | Any of the above can be discussed for consistency for future articles. Thanks! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 16:52, 17 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:This isn't the only page being changed. I just don't actively change pages for alphabetics/adventurer last names unless the page is in need of more pressing changes at the same time. My way of being consistent is to include denizen titles (which, also to be consistent, should always be on the "Inhabitants" list) in alphabetising. I also think adventurer surnames should also always be added, and a good portion of pages now have them, from House leader lines in the infoboxes to passing mentions of adventurers involved in major events. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 18:18, 17 April 2008 (GMT) | :This isn't the only page being changed. I just don't actively change pages for alphabetics/adventurer last names unless the page is in need of more pressing changes at the same time. My way of being consistent is to include denizen titles (which, also to be consistent, should always be on the "Inhabitants" list) in alphabetising. I also think adventurer surnames should also always be added, and a good portion of pages now have them, from House leader lines in the infoboxes to passing mentions of adventurers involved in major events. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 18:18, 17 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
::Adventurer surnames for infoboxes: yes or no? Still inconsistent. Examples: House and City leaders have last names but discoverers do not. Would like to put a final word on this as well, thanks. Also, if anyone can find on which article we discussed this last (or was it a forum thread?), I would be very appreciative! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:25, 10 January 2009
Hmm, two things:
1) Is there an inhabitant alphabetic protocol we're supposed to be using that I don't know about that warranted the recent changes, or why is this the only one being changed? 2) I don't see last names being included for the discovering adventurers for many of the isle articles. Is there protocol for this too or why is this the only one being changed?
Any of the above can be discussed for consistency for future articles. Thanks! Asara 16:52, 17 April 2008 (GMT)
- This isn't the only page being changed. I just don't actively change pages for alphabetics/adventurer last names unless the page is in need of more pressing changes at the same time. My way of being consistent is to include denizen titles (which, also to be consistent, should always be on the "Inhabitants" list) in alphabetising. I also think adventurer surnames should also always be added, and a good portion of pages now have them, from House leader lines in the infoboxes to passing mentions of adventurers involved in major events. --Krypton 18:18, 17 April 2008 (GMT)
- Adventurer surnames for infoboxes: yes or no? Still inconsistent. Examples: House and City leaders have last names but discoverers do not. Would like to put a final word on this as well, thanks. Also, if anyone can find on which article we discussed this last (or was it a forum thread?), I would be very appreciative! Asara 17:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)