Difference between revisions of "Talk:Babel"

383 bytes added ,  16:02, 22 April 2008
no edit summary
(Occult vs. occult)
Line 9: Line 9:


Imyrr, you're the one who capitalised it as "Occult" in the first place. That's why I linked it. As for my uncapitalisation, that's because my personal opinion was that, even if it is tied to Occultism, "occult" didn't deserve to be capitalised. But if there are any opinions about whether it should be capitalised and linked, uncapitalised and unlinked, or any other combination thereof, please state them. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 16:54, 20 April 2008 (GMT)
Imyrr, you're the one who capitalised it as "Occult" in the first place. That's why I linked it. As for my uncapitalisation, that's because my personal opinion was that, even if it is tied to Occultism, "occult" didn't deserve to be capitalised. But if there are any opinions about whether it should be capitalised and linked, uncapitalised and unlinked, or any other combination thereof, please state them. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 16:54, 20 April 2008 (GMT)
It's just out of habit, don't get so defensive. The markings on the seal stated they were occult (possibly even Occult, I don't have the description on hand) in nature, but those markings had nothing to do with Occultism. Capitalised or not, I don't care, but it never really pertained to Occultism the skill or even House symbolism. [[User:Imyrr|Imyrr]] 16:02, 22 April 2008 (GMT)
17

edits