Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nishnatoba"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Can we get descriptions of the various icons and put them on the Relics page possibly under their own subcategory?[[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 08:16, 13 January 2007 (GMT) | Can we get descriptions of the various icons and put them on the Relics page possibly under their own subcategory?[[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 08:16, 13 January 2007 (GMT) | ||
** Sure! Putting them under the 'relics' category is a good idea. If you need any help with the fallen ones, let me know. --[[User:Tasshya|Tasshya]] 16:47, 16 January 2007 (GMT) | |||
The areas for the fallen icons can still be accessed, it's just a long walk to get to them now that there's no shadow icon. Not sure how to say that though. --[[User:Kunama|Kunama]] 14:27, 16 January 2007 (GMT)Kunama | |||
Latest revision as of 16:47, 16 January 2007
Should we not remove the icons that have fallen? Or at least put a note in that they have fallen? - Misdun, 14 Aug '06
If someone gets a chance before I do, could you go up to Nish and write a small bit on the Maldaathi and Serpentlords' icons? --Missy 17:00, 21 August 2006 (GMT)
I added the Serpentlord's Icon to the list of active Icons, but I don't have the information for its 'rooms'. I also added Mhaldor's newly fallen Icons to the list of those fallen, but don't have their room information either. If someone has those archived, it would be great.
I've added the information that was missing for the icon areas. --Tasshya 18:56, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
Can we get descriptions of the various icons and put them on the Relics page possibly under their own subcategory?Corvax 08:16, 13 January 2007 (GMT)
- Sure! Putting them under the 'relics' category is a good idea. If you need any help with the fallen ones, let me know. --Tasshya 16:47, 16 January 2007 (GMT)
The areas for the fallen icons can still be accessed, it's just a long walk to get to them now that there's no shadow icon. Not sure how to say that though. --Kunama 14:27, 16 January 2007 (GMT)Kunama