78
edits
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Seafaring Specialists"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Category talk:Seafaring Specialists (view source)
Revision as of 09:08, 9 January 2009
, 09:08, 9 January 2009Comment
m (feedback needed) |
(Comment) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
With regards to the recent edits of the Ambo article, we've to finalize policy concerning location disclosure. As the HELP SEAFARING SPECIALISTS scroll states that "their locations are not always so well known", should we remove the locations of the other four as well, or what? I think it would be a disservice to remove some of them, though, in relation to other facets of the denizen. Opinions? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | With regards to the recent edits of the Ambo article, we've to finalize policy concerning location disclosure. As the HELP SEAFARING SPECIALISTS scroll states that "their locations are not always so well known", should we remove the locations of the other four as well, or what? I think it would be a disservice to remove some of them, though, in relation to other facets of the denizen. Opinions? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Bump. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC) | :Bump. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Hm. On one hand, we have a page about most every denizen, significant or not, on the Archives. On the other, the scroll lists their names but not their locations, and it does indeed do them a disservice to hide their location on their record. So it is easy for someone to connect the name to the Archive record. My views are that it's not such a big secret. Anyone can find out their locations and announce them to the world. It's not hard to ask someone via Market. Personally, I'm for listing the specialists' locations in their respective articles because of this. Anyone can find out very easily, not like hidden Order mechanics or internal House structure. [[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 09:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | |||