Difference between revisions of "Talk:Year"

198 bytes added ,  12:37, 9 May 2008
no edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
:::Now that would be interesting! I still don't understand your use of "currently", unfortunately - I think we're going a bit too far on it. By "currently", our current (as in, right now, the present time) method of dating uses AF, period, so whether or not we still reference BF dates does not undermine our years as being AF. Does that make sense? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 02:09, 9 May 2008 (GMT)
:::Now that would be interesting! I still don't understand your use of "currently", unfortunately - I think we're going a bit too far on it. By "currently", our current (as in, right now, the present time) method of dating uses AF, period, so whether or not we still reference BF dates does not undermine our years as being AF. Does that make sense? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 02:09, 9 May 2008 (GMT)
::::Perfectly. _my_ point however was that AF and BF are used concurrently, so it doesn't make usage of the term "currently" any more appropriate (since there was never a transition between usage of "BF" to usage of "AF"); I'm not denouncing "currently" as an inappropriate term, though. --[[User:Slurpz|Slurpz]] 02:26, 9 May 2008 (GMT)
::::Perfectly. _my_ point however was that AF and BF are used concurrently, so it doesn't make usage of the term "currently" any more appropriate (since there was never a transition between usage of "BF" to usage of "AF"); I'm not denouncing "currently" as an inappropriate term, though. --[[User:Slurpz|Slurpz]] 02:26, 9 May 2008 (GMT)
:::::Oi. Well, given that you understand my usage of currently, that AF and only AF is what dates our years right now, what would you suggest otherwise? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 12:37, 9 May 2008 (GMT)