17
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ram's Horn (disambiguation)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Ram's Horn (disambiguation) (view source)
Revision as of 17:16, 4 April 2008
, 17:16, 4 April 2008no edit summary
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::::::Personally, I am fine with a "Ram's Horn", "Ram's horn", and "Ram's horn (artefact)" with disambig notes at the top, like every other article with a disambig. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 04:43, 4 April 2008 (GMT) | ::::::Personally, I am fine with a "Ram's Horn", "Ram's horn", and "Ram's horn (artefact)" with disambig notes at the top, like every other article with a disambig. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 04:43, 4 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:::::::I don't know, but it was your response when I asked. Something along the lines of "Yes, non-specific search terms should always redirect to the disambiguation page instead of open a content page." --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 08:43, 4 April 2008 (GMT) | :::::::I don't know, but it was your response when I asked. Something along the lines of "Yes, non-specific search terms should always redirect to the disambiguation page instead of open a content page." --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 08:43, 4 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
::::::::Nah. I don't remember ever giving an absolute for this. I vote for "Ram's Horn", "Ram's horn", "Ram's horn (artefact)", and the disambig page. If nobody knows what I'm talking about, I'll do it myself so you can see. I'd rather not have to come up with something that doesn't sound good just to fit an unofficial rule. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:16, 4 April 2008 (GMT) | |||