Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Empires"

:Throughout the entire pre-Seleucarian history of Shallam, the leader's title was that of Emperor. (The traditional title of "Sultan" still existed, though, as evidenced by [[Caro-Kann]].) I imagine that'd stem from the control that Shallam exercised over a good portion of the continent for nearly a thousand years - the same dominion which allowed it to quite literally pave itself in gold. The [[emperor]] article mentions it to some extent, if I recall. -- {{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 15:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT)

:Throughout the entire pre-Seleucarian history of Shallam, the leader's title was that of Emperor. (The traditional title of "Sultan" still existed, though, as evidenced by [[Caro-Kann]].) I imagine that'd stem from the control that Shallam exercised over a good portion of the continent for nearly a thousand years - the same dominion which allowed it to quite literally pave itself in gold. The [[emperor]] article mentions it to some extent, if I recall. -- {{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 15:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT)

::Perfect. Should we direct the link to a separate "Shallamese Empire" then, as "Empire" is indicative of a time pre-Seleucar and today's Shallam is not usually referenced as an Empire but as a city-state who no longer holds that extent of territory? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:08, 26 April 2007 (GMT)

::Perfect. Should we direct the link to a separate "Shallamese Empire" then, as "Empire" is indicative of a time pre-Seleucar and today's Shallam is not usually referenced as an Empire but as a city-state who no longer holds that extent of territory? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:08, 26 April 2007 (GMT)