17
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Charter of Oakstone"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
If this is verbatim, it's probably fine. Though one has to wonder which edition out of the many in the realms we should go by... --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 10:22, 1 April 2008 (GMT) | If this is verbatim, it's probably fine. Though one has to wonder which edition out of the many in the realms we should go by... --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 10:22, 1 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:The most current one? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:52, 1 April 2008 (GMT) | :The most current one? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:52, 1 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
::Each forestal House has its own "copy" (via House help scrolls), and since they are free to be edited by House officials, they may differ between the Houses. Then there is also the "official" heavy tome at Central Oak that also holds the Charter of Oakstone (which is, by the way, its real name, not "Oakstone Charter"), but if that one has changed to reflect new policies, I don't know. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 14:55, 1 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
:::Use the official one - from the edits, it seems this is what we're doing and it's fine. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:06, 1 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
:::Following what Krypton said, perhaps this should be moved to '''Charter of Oakstone'''? ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 07:30, 2 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
::::If no one objects. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 15:08, 2 April 2008 (GMT) | |||
:::::Fixed. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:23, 3 April 2008 (GMT) | |||