Difference between revisions of "User talk:Asara"

:Regarding the misc artefact categorization, it seems a bit redundant to me. Regarding the category links in the body of the article, it's one of our wiki rules not to include the link twice, as this is also redundant. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

:Regarding the misc artefact categorization, it seems a bit redundant to me. Regarding the category links in the body of the article, it's one of our wiki rules not to include the link twice, as this is also redundant. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

::There's no guarentee that all discontinued artefacts will be miscellaneous, so far as I know. You did mention on the category's talk page that some kind of armour was discontinued, correct? And for the redundant links, I agree for the most part. I kind of want to keep them where there's ambiguity though - say, the inline link in the pipes/vials pages, because not all pipes or vials are discontinued: it gives clarity rather than redundancy. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 00:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

::There's no guarentee that all discontinued artefacts will be miscellaneous, so far as I know. You did mention on the category's talk page that some kind of armour was discontinued, correct? And for the redundant links, I agree for the most part. I kind of want to keep them where there's ambiguity though - say, the inline link in the pipes/vials pages, because not all pipes or vials are discontinued: it gives clarity rather than redundancy. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 00:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)