Difference between revisions of "User talk:Asara"
m (→Discontinued artefacts: I meant "dead-end". (typofix)) |
m |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Discontinued artefacts== | ==Discontinued artefacts== | ||
Isn't there some merit in categorizing the artefacts under [[:Category:Miscellaneous Artefacts|Miscellaneous Artefacts]] (if they were misc before discontinuation)? The artefacts certainly still ''exist'', with the same properties from before. (Also, on a subjective note, I like to have category links in pages even if the page is already categorized as such, since it gives context in-line and can also help with dead-end pages. But that's really just me) ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 22:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | Isn't there some merit in categorizing the artefacts under [[:Category:Miscellaneous Artefacts|Miscellaneous Artefacts]] (if they were misc before discontinuation)? The artefacts certainly still ''exist'', with the same properties from before. (Also, on a subjective note, I like to have category links in pages even if the page is already categorized as such, since it gives context in-line and can also help with dead-end pages. But that's really just me) ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 22:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Regarding the misc artefact categorization, it seems a bit redundant to me. Regarding the category links in the body of the article, it's one of our wiki rules not to include the link twice, as this is also redundant. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 00:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:00, 22 January 2009
Hi Asara! Signitures and indentions are pretty easy. For The regular signature, just do ~~~~. There's a name-only option that uses three, and a time only option that uses 5. I think 4's the best, though! As for indentions, simply use :s. One for one indention, two for two, and so on! Valeo 19:53, 4 Jul 2005 (GMT)
Mysterion's date of stepping down
Agrias told me that she stepped down the same year he did, so I edited the ???'s from Mysterion's year. Just curious why that was removed? ~Soludra 18:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand. Why what was removed? Asara 21:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- I forgot to say which page, oops. this history, your edit. It removed the date I filled in for Mysterion's date of stepping down. ~Soludra 22:45, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, what the heck? I don't remember touching that at all, as I was just going in to edit the double link and wrote such in the summary box...????? In any case, that shouldn't have happened. Thanks for putting it back in! Asara 12:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- I forgot to say which page, oops. this history, your edit. It removed the date I filled in for Mysterion's date of stepping down. ~Soludra 22:45, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Discontinued artefacts
Isn't there some merit in categorizing the artefacts under Miscellaneous Artefacts (if they were misc before discontinuation)? The artefacts certainly still exist, with the same properties from before. (Also, on a subjective note, I like to have category links in pages even if the page is already categorized as such, since it gives context in-line and can also help with dead-end pages. But that's really just me) ~Soludra 22:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Regarding the misc artefact categorization, it seems a bit redundant to me. Regarding the category links in the body of the article, it's one of our wiki rules not to include the link twice, as this is also redundant. Asara 00:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)