222
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zanzibaar"
no edit summary
m |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Any of the above can be discussed for consistency for future articles. Thanks! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 16:52, 17 April 2008 (GMT) | Any of the above can be discussed for consistency for future articles. Thanks! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 16:52, 17 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:This isn't the only page being changed. I just don't actively change pages for alphabetics/adventurer last names unless the page is in need of more pressing changes at the same time. My way of being consistent is to include denizen titles (which, also to be consistent, should always be on the "Inhabitants" list) in alphabetising. I also think adventurer surnames should also always be added, and a good portion of pages now have them, from House leader lines in the infoboxes to passing mentions of adventurers involved in major events. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 18:18, 17 April 2008 (GMT) | :This isn't the only page being changed. I just don't actively change pages for alphabetics/adventurer last names unless the page is in need of more pressing changes at the same time. My way of being consistent is to include denizen titles (which, also to be consistent, should always be on the "Inhabitants" list) in alphabetising. I also think adventurer surnames should also always be added, and a good portion of pages now have them, from House leader lines in the infoboxes to passing mentions of adventurers involved in major events. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 18:18, 17 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
::Adventurer surnames for infoboxes: yes or no? Still inconsistent. Examples: House and City leaders have last names but discoverers do not. Would like to put a final word on this as well, thanks. Also, if anyone can find on which article we discussed this last (or was it a forum thread?), I would be very appreciative! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Given that surnames can change at titling whim, I'd say no. Also, http://forums.achaea.com/index.php?showtopic=25272&st=0&p=691946&#entry691946 --[[User:Kunama|Kunama]] 11:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::That thread seems to support what I would say on this: yes to adventurer surnames within the context of infoboxes and articles. You're contradicting the stance you put forth in the thread, by the way. I would go on to say that a suitably notable adventurer is not the sort to change his or her surname just to screw with Lore (whether by virtue of being dormant, or simply having integrity), but that can of worms was one of the things that chased away my interest in Lore to begin with. :) --{{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 13:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | |||