Difference between revisions of "Talk:Temple of Concordia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I just wanted to know if linking within the Article title is really necessary, it just kind of bugs me for some reason. I'd prefer the title be considered a single unit without having bits and pieces of it linking off elsewhere. We can link to any relevant articles later on in the article body. [[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 19:16, 5 November 2007 (GMT) | I just wanted to know if linking within the Article title is really necessary, it just kind of bugs me for some reason. I'd prefer the title be considered a single unit without having bits and pieces of it linking off elsewhere. We can link to any relevant articles later on in the article body. [[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 19:16, 5 November 2007 (GMT) | ||
:I agree that it's not nice-looking, but a good number of articles have done that already. Revert changes, or just not link in titles from now on? Also, it seems to be less irksome if a link happens in the middle of the title (i.e. the link has bold black words to both sides). --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 21:25, 5 November 2007 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 21:25, 5 November 2007
I just wanted to know if linking within the Article title is really necessary, it just kind of bugs me for some reason. I'd prefer the title be considered a single unit without having bits and pieces of it linking off elsewhere. We can link to any relevant articles later on in the article body. Corvax 19:16, 5 November 2007 (GMT)
- I agree that it's not nice-looking, but a good number of articles have done that already. Revert changes, or just not link in titles from now on? Also, it seems to be less irksome if a link happens in the middle of the title (i.e. the link has bold black words to both sides). --Krypton 21:25, 5 November 2007 (GMT)