Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sentinels of Nature"

Comment
(Comment)
 
Line 4: Line 4:


"447 AF - The Sentinels' icon is attacked by Mhaldorian forces." Unless this statement could accurately be clarified as "The Sentinels' icon experiences its first major attack at the hands of Mhaldorian forces," I think it is unnecessary. It's not as if they attacked once in 447, then never again until 464, succeeding the second time around to destroy the Crown; obviously, there have been other attempts in between. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 20:42, 6 November 2007 (GMT)
"447 AF - The Sentinels' icon is attacked by Mhaldorian forces." Unless this statement could accurately be clarified as "The Sentinels' icon experiences its first major attack at the hands of Mhaldorian forces," I think it is unnecessary. It's not as if they attacked once in 447, then never again until 464, succeeding the second time around to destroy the Crown; obviously, there have been other attempts in between. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 20:42, 6 November 2007 (GMT)
:Not quite sure why we have such a lengthy timeline at all for the Sentinels. There's a lot that's not totally Sentinel-oriented, and it could ''definitely'' be presented better. [[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 21:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
78

edits