Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ram's Horn (disambiguation)"

no edit summary
(Commenting)
Line 8: Line 8:
:If we choose to, yes Ram's horn should redirect to the disambig and "Ram's horn (public)" is fine, but I'm not completely sold on it. Personally, I don't mind leaving [[Ram's horn]] the way it is and having people use the disambig note at the top of the article to get to the artefact. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 23:06, 3 April 2008 (GMT)
:If we choose to, yes Ram's horn should redirect to the disambig and "Ram's horn (public)" is fine, but I'm not completely sold on it. Personally, I don't mind leaving [[Ram's horn]] the way it is and having people use the disambig note at the top of the article to get to the artefact. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 23:06, 3 April 2008 (GMT)
::Mm, I like that last idea. The horn artefact is just a portable version of the others scattered around anyways; they're not even as separate as the gold commodity and the gold currency. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 01:25, 4 April 2008 (GMT)
::Mm, I like that last idea. The horn artefact is just a portable version of the others scattered around anyways; they're not even as separate as the gold commodity and the gold currency. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 01:25, 4 April 2008 (GMT)
:::I'm not sure what that "last idea" suggests, though. Do you mean leaving [[ram's horn]] the page for the non-portable ones, and using a disambig note on that page to come to the disambiguation page, which would then link to a [[ram's horn (artefact)]] page? If I interpreted that correctly, then the portable and non-portable horns are still getting different pages, which is good, but now the general rule that search terms that match the disambiguation lead to the disambiguation page isn't being met, which is not good (if not necessarily very bad *shrug*). I think it's time for another picture, Asara.. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 02:53, 4 April 2008 (GMT)
1,131

edits