78
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Psychometry"
Comment
(Comment) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Similarly to my comment on [[Two Arts]], is this really worthy of being classed as a [[:Category:Skills|skill]]? Were adventurers ever able to use it? This and the [[psychics]] article suggests ''someone'' was able to, but depending on ''who'', it might not need to be in the Skills category. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 20:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | Similarly to my comment on [[Two Arts]], is this really worthy of being classed as a [[:Category:Skills|skill]]? Were adventurers ever able to use it? This and the [[psychics]] article suggests ''someone'' was able to, but depending on ''who'', it might not need to be in the Skills category. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 20:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:At the moment, "Skills" is defined as "sets of like abilities." We'll have to agree on redefining our skills category as "adventurer-only" before moving the other three articles as you've suggested. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 01:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | :At the moment, "Skills" is defined as "sets of like abilities." We'll have to agree on redefining our skills category as "adventurer-only" before moving the other three articles as you've suggested. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 01:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::At the moment, the category says: ''Skills are sets of like abilities. Some skills, like Avoidance and Weaponry, are available to all adventurers, while others are unique to one's choice of class.'' It seems to imply adventurer-available skills, giving little provision to others. Would you agree with making the definition of Category:Skills more clear-cut, somehow? ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 01:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||