1,191
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pike"
removing broken link
m |
(removing broken link) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
thing - a long shaft of wood with some sort of blade or point at the end. | thing - a long shaft of wood with some sort of blade or point at the end. | ||
2) a sort of fish. | 2) a sort of fish. | ||
-I- wouldn't. I would delete it instead, actually, given the existence of this help scroll should compel us to make a page about the fish, followed by a | -I- wouldn't. I would delete it instead, actually, given the existence of this help scroll should compel us to make a page about the fish, followed by a "Pike (disambiguation)", which is really more work than is necessary. Additionally, as can be seen from the help scroll, the lore article is both lacking thoroughness and smacking of some OOC material, to say nothing of the minimal contribution having such a page has anyway. But that's my issue. If you just want to put it in [[:Category:Objects]], such a minimalist course of action would be a-okay with me, too. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 04:15, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
:... Well that's a lovely attitude, Krypton. =D You could always make the disambiguation page and link to this article as well as [[fish]]. Given how much time we've spent nitpicking in discussion tabs than articles, doing that wouldn't take much more than usual. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 13:27, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | :... Well that's a lovely attitude, Krypton. =D You could always make the disambiguation page and link to this article as well as [[fish]]. Given how much time we've spent nitpicking in discussion tabs than articles, doing that wouldn't take much more than usual. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 13:27, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | ||
::Lol. Well, instead of making a disambig, I suppose we could just have this one article explain both definitionsm, as the help scroll does. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 19:55, 11 April 2008 (GMT) | |||