1,131
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marisol"
no edit summary
m (Typo) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
You essentially answered this yourself, Krypton! It is a divinely-supervised project, not a divinely-run project. We oversee and comment when asked to or when we notice something awry. In both this case and with Ba'relo I happen to know a lot about them so I've edited things or suggested you research and edit it yourself. If you cannot find out the information via in-character means or without us having to clarify/explain things, it probably should not be on here in the first place, as it would be neither easily publicly accessible or, and perhaps most importantly, official lore. I hope that clarifies things for you. --[[User:Mithraea|Mithraea]] 04:33, 10 February 2008 (GMT) | You essentially answered this yourself, Krypton! It is a divinely-supervised project, not a divinely-run project. We oversee and comment when asked to or when we notice something awry. In both this case and with Ba'relo I happen to know a lot about them so I've edited things or suggested you research and edit it yourself. If you cannot find out the information via in-character means or without us having to clarify/explain things, it probably should not be on here in the first place, as it would be neither easily publicly accessible or, and perhaps most importantly, official lore. I hope that clarifies things for you. --[[User:Mithraea|Mithraea]] 04:33, 10 February 2008 (GMT) | ||
:It does indeed, thank You very much. I obviously wasn't here in the early stages of the project, so all I could do was observe that Divine contributions and discussions were extremely common back then, but not the reasoning behind what happened then and what happens now. As for the Ba'relo and Marisol pages, I attempt them only because Lore policy seems to dictate that no denizen is exempt from having a page (unless perhaps a specific request is made; has such a thing occurred?), though Order-/House-specifics and other such limited info can and will be excluded. (I also attempt them thanks to the immortalisation of their names through the Events posts, so the existence of these denizens is at least known to the educated populace.) Is a change in order for the apparent policy? It shouldn't be too surprising that our contributions can start becoming erroneous when we try to tread onto ground covered by the information not everyone is supposed to know, despite such denizens still deserving a page of their own. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 05:22, 10 February 2008 (GMT) | |||