Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hashan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:If the being was destroyed and no longer exists, it would belong in the historical figures category. Any "<area> Denizen" category should only include current denizens (unless specified otherwise). A Sentontot is more of a creature than a denizen (it is not sentient), so it would belong in the creatures category and not the denizen category (or the inhabitants list). The prostitutes question is a bit tougher - I would probably leave it in the denizen list as the category is appropriate for the prostitutes article itself (Kaethryn being a prostitute). [[User:Asara|Asara]] 03:52, 13 July 2007 (GMT) | :If the being was destroyed and no longer exists, it would belong in the historical figures category. Any "<area> Denizen" category should only include current denizens (unless specified otherwise). A Sentontot is more of a creature than a denizen (it is not sentient), so it would belong in the creatures category and not the denizen category (or the inhabitants list). The prostitutes question is a bit tougher - I would probably leave it in the denizen list as the category is appropriate for the prostitutes article itself (Kaethryn being a prostitute). [[User:Asara|Asara]] 03:52, 13 July 2007 (GMT) | ||
The laws of Hashan are searchable...should the Great Canon of Hashan in the infobox be internally linked? -- Bluef | |||
Revision as of 02:21, 22 July 2007
REFERENCES:
- Public News 2707 from Sarapis explains Hashan's expansion, and in 2718 Gaia responds to Hashan for the incident. Madelyne 21:03, 3 April 2007 (GMT)
These denizens were destroyed by Mukamuttara (who was also destroyed herself). Not entirely sure if they belong on the inhabitants list (or the denizen one) anymore:
Also "a vicious Setontot" is an animal in our Menagerie. The other animals were listed there so I didn't include it on the inhabitants listing either (should it be on denizens?) Finally, I think our only prostitute is Kaethryn. Should they be removed from the denizen list as well?
Previous was written by Bluef.
- If the being was destroyed and no longer exists, it would belong in the historical figures category. Any "<area> Denizen" category should only include current denizens (unless specified otherwise). A Sentontot is more of a creature than a denizen (it is not sentient), so it would belong in the creatures category and not the denizen category (or the inhabitants list). The prostitutes question is a bit tougher - I would probably leave it in the denizen list as the category is appropriate for the prostitutes article itself (Kaethryn being a prostitute). Asara 03:52, 13 July 2007 (GMT)
The laws of Hashan are searchable...should the Great Canon of Hashan in the infobox be internally linked? -- Bluef