132
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darkness"
m
no edit summary
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
**It could also be argued that 'Modern Darkness' (which I thought was written by Telaan? I could be wrong) isn't even a core work to Darkness (you could even argue that Darkness, as a system, lacks a 'bible' of any kind). I'm not here to make that argument. But citations are the way to go. Alternatively if Darkness is "difficult to ACTUALLY define", maybe just include that in the wiki article and leave the details as properly FOIG! -[[User:Halos|Halos]] ([[User talk:Halos|talk]]) | **It could also be argued that 'Modern Darkness' (which I thought was written by Telaan? I could be wrong) isn't even a core work to Darkness (you could even argue that Darkness, as a system, lacks a 'bible' of any kind). I'm not here to make that argument. But citations are the way to go. Alternatively if Darkness is "difficult to ACTUALLY define", maybe just include that in the wiki article and leave the details as properly FOIG! -[[User:Halos|Halos]] ([[User talk:Halos|talk]]) | ||
***Can I advise that HELP TWILIGHT might be good inspo. -[[User:Halos|Halos]] ([[User talk:Halos|talk]]) 02:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC) | ***Can I advise that HELP TWILIGHT might be good inspo. -[[User:Halos|Halos]] ([[User talk:Halos|talk]]) 02:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
**** I've cut the article in half, valid points. It has now the core beliefs. It is difficult to really write on, given that most of the darkness records are outdated and now non-canon works from previous Twilights. Even the 'bible' is rejected. I suppose they really want Darkness to remain thematically ambiguous? -- [[User:Grif|Grif] | |||