8,097
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darkness"
no edit summary
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Modern Darkness: Third edition is peculiar as it was written by a denizen. No idea who, exactly. Its highly likely someone who plays Twilight (ID shows up as random numbers to preserve anonymity) . I didn't really want to put the extract in, but when Darkness is constantly being redefined, it's difficult to ACTUALLY define. - Grif 08/06/2022 | Modern Darkness: Third edition is peculiar as it was written by a denizen. No idea who, exactly. Its highly likely someone who plays Twilight (ID shows up as random numbers to preserve anonymity) . I didn't really want to put the extract in, but when Darkness is constantly being redefined, it's difficult to ACTUALLY define. - Grif 08/06/2022 | ||
* A few points: 1) articles about ideals should ''summarize'' those ideals. 2) This one lacks a neutral tone which is likely due to 3) it's 90% c/p'd from an IG work. I get that it's illuminating work which may or may not be central to the religion, but if you're just dropping in whole blocks of text then title the article that, like [[Holy Codex]] or [[Shadow Codex]] and stick it in the [[:category: documents|documents]] category. Look at [[Evil]]. It's super succinct with its core tenets. It accurately summarizes the IG doctrine's basic principles. Look at [[Good]]. Short. No one dropped entire paragraphs from the Apocrypha or Holy Codex. -[[User:Halos|Halos]] ([[User talk:Halos|talk]]) | |||