Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bright blue hares"

no edit summary
(answer)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
For both this page and the [[polka-dotted turtles]], I don't know whether [[:Category:Creatures of the Erisian Pyramid]] or [[:Category:Creatures of Confusia]] (since they are limited to the area surveyable as "Confusia") is better. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 05:07, 3 January 2008 (GMT)
For both this page and the [[polka-dotted turtles]], I don't know whether [[:Category:Creatures of the Erisian Pyramid]] or [[:Category:Creatures of Confusia]] (since they are limited to the area surveyable as "Confusia") is better. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 05:07, 3 January 2008 (GMT)
:Unless there are a sufficient amount of creatures (articles) to be placed within a Creatures of Confusia category to make it viable, place everything within a "Creatures of the Erisian Pyramid" article as it is still technically correct. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 01:32, 4 January 2008 (GMT)
:Unless there are a sufficient amount of creatures (articles) to be placed within a Creatures of Confusia category to make it viable, place everything within a "Creatures of the Erisian Pyramid" article as it is still technically correct. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 01:32, 4 January 2008 (GMT)
::Problem is, as far as I can see, these two and the ideograms are the only creatures in the Erisian Pyramid, and all are found only in Confusia. If there were any creatures not in Confusia, then yes, better to have them all be categorised as "Creatures of the Erisian Pyramid," but there arn't. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 01:47, 4 January 2008 (GMT)
:::Just leave it as it is right now. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:24, 4 January 2008 (GMT)