Difference between revisions of "Talk:Apocrypha"

From AchaeaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply to comment)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
:Given it's a publicly displayed document, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be included. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 03:03, 11 April 2008 (GMT)
:Given it's a publicly displayed document, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be included. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 03:03, 11 April 2008 (GMT)
Of course, we will be wanting to compare this copy to the original at Stygian Crossroads sometime. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 04:03, 11 April 2008 (GMT)
Of course, we will be wanting to compare this copy to the original at Stygian Crossroads sometime. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 04:03, 11 April 2008 (GMT)
:Of course! I'm afraid I personally won't be able to do so, however, hence my use of a second-hand copy. I don't think the "I'm loitering here for RESEARCH!" excuse would persuade many Mhaldorians, heh. — [[User:Kenner|Kenner]] 16:48, 11 April 2008 (GMT)

Latest revision as of 16:48, 11 April 2008

Question

IG, I have access to a copy (I'm sure it's accurate, but it might not be complete) of the Apocrypha. Shall I post it here? Has it not been posted because it shouldn't be posted, or because nobody has bothered to? — Kenner 02:23, 11 April 2008 (GMT)

Given it's a publicly displayed document, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be included. --Krypton 03:03, 11 April 2008 (GMT)

Of course, we will be wanting to compare this copy to the original at Stygian Crossroads sometime. --Krypton 04:03, 11 April 2008 (GMT)

Of course! I'm afraid I personally won't be able to do so, however, hence my use of a second-hand copy. I don't think the "I'm loitering here for RESEARCH!" excuse would persuade many Mhaldorians, heh. — Kenner 16:48, 11 April 2008 (GMT)