Talk:Achaean Lingo
Should this be updated in-depth at some point?
Heh. Yeah, a detailed update would probably be of use. Perhaps we should start adding terms as and when, and have it as an on-going project? --Tasshya 15:03, 25 October 2006 (GMT)
The local links aren't working for this page. Not sure how to fix them... Cypra 01:15, 6 November 2006 (GMT)
They don't link directly to the terms, but they will for the letters. --Kunama 19:46, 25 April 2007 (GMT)
Hmm, couple questions:
- 1) Should Z/Zsarachnor be removed, too (since Bella and Yudhi were)? Why were Bella and Yudhi removed? (If Z was simply overlooked, then never mind, I know the answer!)
- 2) Changing ":Category:Houses|House" to just "House" will bring you to the disambiguation page. Rogues are defined as not belonging to organisational Houses in particular, arn't they? (You know, as opposed to not being a member of the House of Delights. :D)
- 3) "Lolzpk" and "Logosian" are now the only entries to have a dash instead of a colon preceding the definition. ??? (Might I add that I am surprised "Lolzpk" was kept over some others? Hehe.)
- --Krypton 02:30, 26 September 2007 (GMT)
- I'm also curious about the items that were removed - what was the rationale for removing them? I'm not questioning anything - just would like to know for future reference. Thanks! Asara 02:48, 26 September 2007 (GMT)
One seemed to be a subtle jab at the Sentaari, which I would assume is far from objective... yet funny, all the same! Danith 11:07, 26 September 2007 (GMT)
Did anyone get an explanation for the removal of Bella and Yudhi? Asara 01:48, 3 October 2007 (GMT)
- -Still- interested in the reasoning. --Krypton 22:26, 9 January 2008 (GMT)
- Seconded. Not going to let this one die! Asara 15:15, 29 December 2007 (GMT)
I think I figured out what happened. Mithraea just reverted all the changes made since "18:59, June 29, 2007" (when Jaizsur added the "lolsentaari" entry). In that case, we can go back and add the ones that are most likely okay, such as "Bella", "Yudhi", "Z", "CFS", etc. --Krypton 20:30, 27 January 2008 (GMT)
- Sounds like the right explanation, but let's not do that until we get divine confirmation. Asara 22:52, 28 January 2008 (GMT)
- It's been almost two months since this last comment. I'm going to add some of those mentioned back on soon if someone doesn't tell me not to, it seems silly to wait so long. It's a wiki: you can revert mistakes. Soludra 05:46, 23 March 2008 (GMT)
- I agree with your "seems silly to wait" comment, but the reason we haven't put them back on is the slight chance Mithraea purposefully removed each and every one of those entries she did (and not simply returned to an older edition of the page). Asara has been trying to get confirmation all this time. If you want to help with that instead, by all means, please do. --Krypton 15:57, 23 March 2008 (GMT)
- Bringing this back up... Soludra 08:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- No, I think Krypton's assessment in this case was the right one. Go ahead and restore sensible entries like "Bella" and "Yudhi". Use your best judgement about what to include here, and please go out of your way to exclude dumb forum memes like "lolsentaari". Neratyne
- Bringing this back up... Soludra 08:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with your "seems silly to wait" comment, but the reason we haven't put them back on is the slight chance Mithraea purposefully removed each and every one of those entries she did (and not simply returned to an older edition of the page). Asara has been trying to get confirmation all this time. If you want to help with that instead, by all means, please do. --Krypton 15:57, 23 March 2008 (GMT)
- It's been almost two months since this last comment. I'm going to add some of those mentioned back on soon if someone doesn't tell me not to, it seems silly to wait so long. It's a wiki: you can revert mistakes. Soludra 05:46, 23 March 2008 (GMT)
ToC move
Regarding your table of contents move, Soludra, aesthetically I can't really say I favour it. I don't automatically look at the right side first when initially scanning documents. I like the idea of bringing it down to the content, though, if we can get it to work somehow. Asara 01:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Eh, yeah, I wasn't so sure either. I was considering something like below (with links), but I couldn't make it look good. ~Soludra 01:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | ... |
| N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | ... |