78
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Achaean Lingo"
Comment
m (think i've got it all now..) |
(Comment) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*3) "Lolzpk" and "Logosian" are now the only entries to have a dash instead of a colon preceding the definition. ??? (Might I add that I am surprised "Lolzpk" was kept over some others? Hehe.) | *3) "Lolzpk" and "Logosian" are now the only entries to have a dash instead of a colon preceding the definition. ??? (Might I add that I am surprised "Lolzpk" was kept over some others? Hehe.) | ||
:--[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 02:30, 26 September 2007 (GMT) | :--[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 02:30, 26 September 2007 (GMT) | ||
:I'm also curious about the items that were removed - what was the rationale for removing them? I'm not questioning anything - just would like to know for future reference. Thanks! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 02:48, 26 September 2007 (GMT) | |||
One seemed to be a subtle jab at the Sentaari, which I would assume is far from objective... yet funny, all the same! [[User:Danith|Danith]] 11:07, 26 September 2007 (GMT) | |||
Did anyone get an explanation for the removal of Bella and Yudhi? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 01:48, 3 October 2007 (GMT) | |||
:<font color="red">-'''''Still'''''-</font> interested in the reasoning. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 22:26, 9 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
:Seconded. Not going to let this one die! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 15:15, 29 December 2007 (GMT) | |||
I think I figured out what happened. Mithraea just reverted all the changes made since "18:59, June 29, 2007" (when Jaizsur added the "lolsentaari" entry). In that case, we can go back and add the ones that are most likely okay, such as "Bella", "Yudhi", "Z", "CFS", etc. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 20:30, 27 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
:Sounds like the right explanation, but let's not do that until we get divine confirmation. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 22:52, 28 January 2008 (GMT) | |||
::It's been almost two months since this last comment. I'm going to add some of those mentioned back on soon if someone doesn't tell me not to, it seems silly to wait so long. It's a wiki: you can revert mistakes. [[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 05:46, 23 March 2008 (GMT) | |||
:::I agree with your "seems silly to wait" comment, but the reason we haven't put them back on is the slight chance Mithraea purposefully removed each and every one of those entries she did (and not simply returned to an older edition of the page). Asara has been trying to get confirmation all this time. If you want to help with that instead, by all means, please do. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 15:57, 23 March 2008 (GMT) | |||
::::Bringing this back up... [[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 08:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::No, I think Krypton's assessment in this case was the right one. Go ahead and restore sensible entries like "Bella" and "Yudhi". Use your best judgement about what to include here, and please go out of your way to exclude dumb forum memes like "lolsentaari". [[User:Neratyne|Neratyne]] | |||
==ToC move== | |||
Regarding your table of contents move, Soludra, aesthetically I can't really say I favour it. I don't automatically look at the right side first when initially scanning documents. I like the idea of bringing it down to the content, though, if we can get it to work somehow. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 01:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Eh, yeah, I wasn't so sure either. I was considering something like below (with links), but I couldn't make it look good. ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 01:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
{|align="center" | |||
|A||B||C||D||E||F||G||... | |||
|- | |||
|N||O||P||Q||R||S||T||... | |||
|} | |||