Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Vertan Denizens"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Maybe [[:Category:Religion]], too. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 13:23, 19 February 2008 (GMT) | ::Maybe [[:Category:Religion]], too. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 13:23, 19 February 2008 (GMT) | ||
:::Eh, why move these articles to less concise and more "stretchy" category relationships? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:33, 19 February 2008 (GMT) | :::Eh, why move these articles to less concise and more "stretchy" category relationships? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 14:33, 19 February 2008 (GMT) | ||
::::[[:Category:Historical Figures]] is not less concise; it's more accurate and consistent with the majority of Vertani not on Sapience now being in that category. And the more I think about [[:Category:Religion]] for [[Imperial Oracles]], the more it starts to make sense. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 16:32, 19 February 2008 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 16:32, 19 February 2008
Necessary category? All articles within could be moved elsewhere. --Krypton 07:22, 18 February 2008 (GMT)
- Like where do you suggest? Asara 22:00, 18 February 2008 (GMT)
- Drafaris and Kadran in Category:Historical Figures. Not sure about Imperial Oracles.. Category:Organisations or Category:Government, whichever one is less of a stretch. --Krypton 01:09, 19 February 2008 (GMT)
- Maybe Category:Religion, too. --Krypton 13:23, 19 February 2008 (GMT)
- Eh, why move these articles to less concise and more "stretchy" category relationships? Asara 14:33, 19 February 2008 (GMT)
- Category:Historical Figures is not less concise; it's more accurate and consistent with the majority of Vertani not on Sapience now being in that category. And the more I think about Category:Religion for Imperial Oracles, the more it starts to make sense. --Krypton 16:32, 19 February 2008 (GMT)
- Eh, why move these articles to less concise and more "stretchy" category relationships? Asara 14:33, 19 February 2008 (GMT)