17
edits
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Humgii"
Category talk:Humgii (view source)
Revision as of 19:49, 11 September 2008
, 19:49, 11 September 2008no edit summary
(Comment) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::::Aye, yet from HELP HUMGII: "Cute little '''''animals''''' with voracious appetites." Personally I'm not sure I see a problem with changing our definition of what Denizens are, unless it be the work involved. Don't a lot of people call pretty much ''everything'' non-adventurer a denizen anyways? ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 17:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ::::Aye, yet from HELP HUMGII: "Cute little '''''animals''''' with voracious appetites." Personally I'm not sure I see a problem with changing our definition of what Denizens are, unless it be the work involved. Don't a lot of people call pretty much ''everything'' non-adventurer a denizen anyways? ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 17:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::Would you rather have Denizens be a subcategory of Creatures? I actually think that might work best. >_> ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 18:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ::::Would you rather have Denizens be a subcategory of Creatures? I actually think that might work best. >_> ~[[User:Soludra|Soludra]] 18:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
::"Animals" does not mutually exclude sentience (sentience can be purchased for pets after all), and you would have to provide explanation for the tells contradiction (I refer to what Krypton provided) to fit your new definition. Similarly, public perception/lingo may not necessarily verify fact (e.g. everyone calling abilities "skills".) However, if you are interested in contesting/changing current established policy, please feel free to make a poll on the forums with these explanations. =) [[User:Asara|Asara]] 19:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | |||