Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Empires"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Throughout the entire pre-Seleucarian history of Shallam, the leader's title was that of Emperor. (The traditional title of "Sultan" still existed, though, as evidenced by [[Caro-Kann]].) I imagine that'd stem from the control that Shallam exercised over a good portion of the continent for nearly a thousand years - the same dominion which allowed it to quite literally pave itself in gold. The [[emperor]] article mentions it to some extent, if I recall. -- {{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 15:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | :Throughout the entire pre-Seleucarian history of Shallam, the leader's title was that of Emperor. (The traditional title of "Sultan" still existed, though, as evidenced by [[Caro-Kann]].) I imagine that'd stem from the control that Shallam exercised over a good portion of the continent for nearly a thousand years - the same dominion which allowed it to quite literally pave itself in gold. The [[emperor]] article mentions it to some extent, if I recall. -- {{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 15:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | ||
::Perfect. Should we direct the link to a separate "Shallamese Empire" then, as "Empire" is indicative of a time pre-Seleucar and today's Shallam is not usually referenced as an Empire but as a city-state who no longer holds that extent of territory? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:08, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | ::Perfect. Should we direct the link to a separate "Shallamese Empire" then, as "Empire" is indicative of a time pre-Seleucar and today's Shallam is not usually referenced as an Empire but as a city-state who no longer holds that extent of territory? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:08, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | ||
:::Which, of course, would lead to a disambiguation page for Shallam (city) and Shallam (empire). [[User:Madelyne|Madelyne]] 21:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 21:17, 26 April 2007
Are these more organisations, or would this be more of a government/political thing that would deem a new category? Madelyne 12:11, 26 April 2007 (GMT)
- I thought about that and decided that if I was going to do it, I'd do it later (unless someone wants to do it now). There's so much that could potentially go into politics, IMHO. -- Delphinus @ 15:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT)
Shallam Empire? Asara 14:57, 26 April 2007 (GMT)
- Throughout the entire pre-Seleucarian history of Shallam, the leader's title was that of Emperor. (The traditional title of "Sultan" still existed, though, as evidenced by Caro-Kann.) I imagine that'd stem from the control that Shallam exercised over a good portion of the continent for nearly a thousand years - the same dominion which allowed it to quite literally pave itself in gold. The emperor article mentions it to some extent, if I recall. -- Delphinus @ 15:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT)
- Perfect. Should we direct the link to a separate "Shallamese Empire" then, as "Empire" is indicative of a time pre-Seleucar and today's Shallam is not usually referenced as an Empire but as a city-state who no longer holds that extent of territory? Asara 18:08, 26 April 2007 (GMT)
- Which, of course, would lead to a disambiguation page for Shallam (city) and Shallam (empire). Madelyne 21:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT)
- Perfect. Should we direct the link to a separate "Shallamese Empire" then, as "Empire" is indicative of a time pre-Seleucar and today's Shallam is not usually referenced as an Empire but as a city-state who no longer holds that extent of territory? Asara 18:08, 26 April 2007 (GMT)