17
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Order"
no edit summary
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Sure, it can be moved as long as all the links are updated cleanly to match. Chaos isn't currently in religion, but that can be solved if said move is implemented. I would ponder the necessities of Creation being excluded from religion, since although there are no Creation-centered religions, Creation's role is involved with plot-driven religious contexts more than anything else. I would also still have to mull over if Order should be in religion only, as it is a reality that is manifest in the Weave outside religious spheres. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:47, 8 March 2008 (GMT) | :::Sure, it can be moved as long as all the links are updated cleanly to match. Chaos isn't currently in religion, but that can be solved if said move is implemented. I would ponder the necessities of Creation being excluded from religion, since although there are no Creation-centered religions, Creation's role is involved with plot-driven religious contexts more than anything else. I would also still have to mull over if Order should be in religion only, as it is a reality that is manifest in the Weave outside religious spheres. [[User:Asara|Asara]] 17:47, 8 March 2008 (GMT) | ||
::::[[:Category:Chaos]] is already in all the correct categories itself. As for Order, I don't think it has any connection to the reality of the Weave. Chaos, after all, could be un-Weaved, as it is still part of reality. The content in the [[Order]] article also says it is merely a principle and not something physical. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 17:58, 8 March 2008 (GMT) | ::::[[:Category:Chaos]] is already in all the correct categories itself. As for Order, I don't think it has any connection to the reality of the Weave. Chaos, after all, could be un-Weaved, as it is still part of reality. The content in the [[Order]] article also says it is merely a principle and not something physical. --[[User:Krypton|Krypton]] 17:58, 8 March 2008 (GMT) | ||
:::::Hm. When I wrote that a long time ago, I was trying to convey it in the contexts of [[Crystalline_Circle|this article]] and [[Twin_Prophecies|this article]], for which Order was a red link (I was filling it in). I guess what we're debating right now is IG foodstuff in itself, that is, whether Order is manifest in reality or not as a tangible entity or otherwise. To make the Order article more appropriate for the physics category, perhaps we could emphasize the Twin Prophecies more, and change "is an abstract entity" to "is understood as an abstract entity", or some variants thereof, as it was probably wrong of me to assume the former anyway. The sentence about Chaos playing anathema to Creation should also be changed to reflect more correct accuracies (see the forum link in [[Talk:Chaos]].) [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:33, 8 March 2008 (GMT) | |||