222
edits
m |
m |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Perfect. Should we direct the link to a separate "Shallamese Empire" then, as "Empire" is indicative of a time pre-Seleucar and today's Shallam is not usually referenced as an Empire but as a city-state who no longer holds that extent of territory? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:08, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | ::Perfect. Should we direct the link to a separate "Shallamese Empire" then, as "Empire" is indicative of a time pre-Seleucar and today's Shallam is not usually referenced as an Empire but as a city-state who no longer holds that extent of territory? [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:08, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | ||
:::Which, of course, would lead to a disambiguation page for Shallam (city) and Shallam (empire). [[User:Madelyne|Madelyne]] 21:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | :::Which, of course, would lead to a disambiguation page for Shallam (city) and Shallam (empire). [[User:Madelyne|Madelyne]] 21:17, 26 April 2007 (GMT) | ||
:::: | ::::I don't really see a need to differentiate. As far as is known, Shallam as a city and Shallam as an empire were the same political entity. Seleucar and the Seleucarian Empire, however, were distinct creatures in entirely different leagues. -- {{User:Delphinus/sig1}} 23:06, 26 April 2007 (GMT) |
edits