I would consider keeping this article in the Relics category as it fits the article definition. Thoughts? Asara 22:39, 11 March 2008 (GMT)
- Heh, I removed it because I felt the mention of the word "item" in the definition excluded it. I wouldn't call an expansive geographical feature an "item". --Krypton 02:29, 12 March 2008 (GMT)
- Well, "item" precludes size restrictions for me, especially for immortals for whom many things, the universe itself included, are mere "things". I would also like to keep the "great power" and ethereal connotation that comes with being a relic, as the Wall of Power has greater implications than being a mere "object". I have re-added the Relic category but also kept the Object category. Asara 02:41, 13 March 2008 (GMT)
- Would simply Category:Geography solve the issue? --Krypton 02:42, 13 March 2008 (GMT)
- Well, "item" precludes size restrictions for me, especially for immortals for whom many things, the universe itself included, are mere "things". I would also like to keep the "great power" and ethereal connotation that comes with being a relic, as the Wall of Power has greater implications than being a mere "object". I have re-added the Relic category but also kept the Object category. Asara 02:41, 13 March 2008 (GMT)