Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hashan"
m |
m |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
I unfortunately do not remember how to edit the infoboxes... if someone could fix the city_infobox, the "Heraldic Arms" parameter is incorrectly spelled on every city page (there should be no second r). Thanks! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | I unfortunately do not remember how to edit the infoboxes... if someone could fix the city_infobox, the "Heraldic Arms" parameter is incorrectly spelled on every city page (there should be no second r). Thanks! [[User:Asara|Asara]] 18:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Got it. [[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 16:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | :Got it. [[User:Corvax|Corvax]] 16:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
----------------------------------------------------------- | |||
The best conundrum is whether Hashan itself floats or not. We can't figure it out. Somebody of the future, please clarify it. [[User:Grif|Grif]] -- 12/06/2022 | |||
Revision as of 01:33, 12 June 2022
The Triad of the Night- Would it really have been created in 222 AF? That's certainly when Twilight became patron, but Elentari did not become Lady Ourania (1/3rd of the Triad) until 248 AF, and Valnurana (the other third) wasn't hailed as overlooking the city until 274 AF. --Valkyre 00:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Amended the wording to address your concern. --Krypton 10:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hashan's Patrons... These are wrong, particularly the dates of patrons between Ourania, Thoth, and Twilight. Bluef
Dates of Hashan's Seneschals... I have been using the Hashan boards for the dates, usually the post where the next person is first mentioned to have taken over, or a post from the previous down where they state they are stepping down Aliath
REFERENCES:
- Public News 2707 from Sarapis explains Hashan's expansion, and in 2718 Gaia responds to Hashan for the incident. Madelyne 21:03, 3 April 2007 (GMT)
These denizens were destroyed by Mukamuttara (who was also destroyed herself). Not entirely sure if they belong on the inhabitants list (or the denizen one) anymore:
Also "a vicious Setontot" is an animal in our Menagerie. The other animals were listed there so I didn't include it on the inhabitants listing either (should it be on denizens?) Finally, I think our only prostitute is Kaethryn. Should they be removed from the denizen list as well?
Previous was written by Bluef.
- If the being was destroyed and no longer exists, it would belong in the historical figures category. Any "<area> Denizen" category should only include current denizens (unless specified otherwise). A Sentontot is more of a creature than a denizen (it is not sentient), so it would belong in the creatures category and not the denizen category (or the inhabitants list). The prostitutes question is a bit tougher - I would probably leave it in the denizen list as the category is appropriate for the prostitutes article itself (Kaethryn being a prostitute). Asara 03:52, 13 July 2007 (GMT)
The laws of Hashan are searchable...should the Great Canon of Hashan in the infobox be internally linked? -- Bluef
The recent Seneschal list is from my own notes, but I'm not sure how accurate it is - would be worth double-checking at some point. Asara 16:22, 19 November 2007 (GMT)
I unfortunately do not remember how to edit the infoboxes... if someone could fix the city_infobox, the "Heraldic Arms" parameter is incorrectly spelled on every city page (there should be no second r). Thanks! Asara 18:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Got it. Corvax 16:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
The best conundrum is whether Hashan itself floats or not. We can't figure it out. Somebody of the future, please clarify it. Grif -- 12/06/2022