Difference between revisions of "Talk:Enlightenment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (responding to Imyrr) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Do you need to mention 'enlightenment' when the ability itself is 'enlighten'? It seems superfluous. Might require a change in page title, though. [[User:Imyrr|Imyrr]] 23:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC) | Do you need to mention 'enlightenment' when the ability itself is 'enlighten'? It seems superfluous. Might require a change in page title, though. [[User:Imyrr|Imyrr]] 23:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Well, if we're going by the page style it should be something like this - | |||
:'''Enlightenment''', when used by [[Occultists]].... | |||
:shouldn't it? [[User:Madelyne|Madelyne]] 04:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:54, 30 August 2009
This is in edit needed because nowhere in the article does it mention "enlightenment". Madelyne 19:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Do you need to mention 'enlightenment' when the ability itself is 'enlighten'? It seems superfluous. Might require a change in page title, though. Imyrr 23:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, if we're going by the page style it should be something like this -
- Enlightenment, when used by Occultists....
- shouldn't it? Madelyne 04:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC)